Bass Shoes Men's Size 9.5 M Very Dark Brown in Leather - Made in Brown Italy 383b2e

Bass Shoes Men's Size 9.5 M Very Dark Brown in Leather  - Made in Brown Italy 383b2eBass Shoes Men's Size 9.5 M Very Dark Brown in Leather  - Made in Brown Italy 383b2eBass Shoes Men's Size 9.5 M Very Dark Brown in Leather  - Made in Brown Italy 383b2eBass Shoes Men's Size 9.5 M Very Dark Brown in Leather  - Made in Brown Italy 383b2eBass Shoes Men's Size 9.5 M Very Dark Brown in Leather  - Made in Brown Italy 383b2eBass Shoes Men's Size 9.5 M Very Dark Brown in Leather  - Made in Brown Italy 383b2eBass Shoes Men's Size 9.5 M Very Dark Brown in Leather  - Made in Brown Italy 383b2eBass Shoes Men's Size 9.5 M Very Dark Brown in Leather  - Made in Brown Italy 383b2e

Item specifics

Condition:
: An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: Bass
US Shoe Size (Men's): 9.5 Country/Region of Manufacture: Italy
Pattern: Solid Style: Oxfords
Width: Medium (D, M) Material: Leather
Color: Brown

Skip to main content

Bass Shoes Men's Size 9.5 M Very Dark Brown in Leather - Made in Brown Italy 383b2e

MARC ANTHONY DAMIAN SAND Suede Leather Driving Shoes horse bit Moccasins size 7,KEEN Newport Men's Sz 14 M Boat Shoes Brown Leather Dock Sail Waterproof 1002901,Mens Bass Tiller T42 Leather Penny Loafer US 7.5 M Brown Slip On Shoes C43 04/01,Steve Madden Men's Batali Sneaker - Choose SZ/Color,Men's/Women's Asics Tiger Shoes Aaron, Indigo Blue/Milk Louis, elaborate luxurious Popular tide shoesSperry Top Sider Mens Leather Boat Shoes Size 12 M,OluKai Nohea Mens Mesh Slip On Shoes Size US 8.5M Brown Orange 10188Ralph Lauren Polo Mens Vaughn Khaki Canvas/Leather Shoes Size 10.5 D EUC,To Boot New York Adam Derrick Men's Loafer Size 9.5 Brown Leather Modern Square,Cole Haan Men’s Shoes 9M Slip On Alligator Brown Leather Mocs Nice A18Gentleman/Lady Men’s Levi’s Fletcher Burnish II Shoes Innovative design new Caramel, gentleKenneth Cole Unlisted Men's Flew The Coop Fashion Sneaker - Choose SZ/Color,Men's PUMA Street Mid Mechanic S Snorkel Blue-Blazing Yellow 30467701 NIB,Clark's CLARKS Women's Grey Suede Leather Comfort Casual Shoes - SZ 9.5M 9.5Eastland Mens Yarmouth Slip-On Loafer- Pick SZ/Color.,Skechers Men's On-The-Go Glide-ABOARD 53768 Navy/Gray Memory Foam New In BoxNew Mens Vans OLD SKOOL (VN-0D3HY28) Blakc Canvas Skate Shoes Fashion SneakersBostonian BLACK SHOES MEN'S SIZE 12 M,US SIZE MEN'S 8 SLIPPERS NEW LOOK DESIGNER HANDMADE FLIP-FLIP INDIAN SANDAL,[STICO] Womens Non-Slip Rubber Boots Waterproof Light-Weight Hygienic WHITE E_n,Gentleman/Lady Timex Men's Charles Street Watch Various styles Won highly appreciated and widely trusted at home and abroad Excellent workmanshipSkechers Men's Go Walk Cool-54651 Sneaker - Choose SZ/Color,Converse Chuck Taylor Dual Collar Hi Ox Beluga Leather Size 6 Mens Gray Shoes,Rocky Men's High Gloss Dress Leather Oxford Shoe Black FQ00510-8,New Nike Men’s Rabona Grey/White Casual Skating Shoes sz 9,Klogs Dusty Unisex Clogs - Made In The Usa Enamel Blue - 10 Medium,Under Armour Street Encounter LTH IV Casual Shoe - Men's Size 11, Grey,SANUK DONNY CABIN FEVER SIDEWALK SURFER SHOES, MEN US 10/ ~NEW,Tabi, Safety working shoes Sokaido: labor boots, Dragon lining, Sho ryu,Camper Brown Leather Casual Oxford Walking Shoes Men's Size 43 / 10,

by Sep. 21, 2018, 8:37 AM

To conduct their study, the researchers varied the gender composition of a hypothetical bipartisan legislative committee and the decision it made about a policy impacting women’s rights.

The legislative committee was either all male or gender-balanced, and the choice on the docket was either to increase or decrease penalties for workplace sexual harassment. Since the victims of workplace harassment are overwhelmingly female, a decision to increase penalties signified a positive impact for women, while the decision to decrease the penalties would signify a negative impact.

The presence of women legitimizes legislative decisions

For each of the four possible conditions, the survey respondents were asked whether the decision was right for all citizens, whether it was right for women specifically and how fair it was to women.

They found that the public was substantially more likely to perceive a decision negatively impacting women as fair when it was made by a gender balanced committee than when the same decision was made by an all-male committee. The gender composition had no effect on what people thought about the fairness of the decision when it positively impacted women.

While the presence of women in the committee was more likely to increase the perceived legitimacy of the antifeminist decision for everyone, the effect was twice as strong for men.