New BURBERRY Size Nude 39 Avon Quilted Honey Nude Size Tan Leather Ballet Flat Gold Buckle 0af8ad

New BURBERRY Size Nude 39 Avon Quilted Honey Nude Size Tan Leather Ballet Flat Gold Buckle 0af8ad

Item specifics

New without box: A brand-new, 你, and 我 item (including handmade items) that is not in original packaging or ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: Burberry
Color: Beige Toe Type: Round Toe
Fastening: Buckle Heel Height: Flat (0 to 1/2 in.)
US Shoe Size (Women's): US 8.5 Style: Ballet Flats
EUR Shoe Size (Women's): EUR 39 Material: Leather
Pattern: quilted Country/Region of Manufacture: Italy
Occasion: Casual Features: gold buckle
Width: Medium (B, M) UPC: Does not apply

Skip to main content

New BURBERRY Size Nude 39 Avon Quilted Honey Nude Size Tan Leather Ballet Flat Gold Buckle 0af8ad

NIB $1390 KITON Brown Calf Suede Wingtip Tassel Loafers US 6.5 (Eu 37) Shoes,sz 10.5 NEW TORY BURCH Ballerina Flats Women's boxwood studded Leather shoesXelero Visalia - Women's Slip-on Orthopedic Control Shoe - All Colors - All Size,Klogs Austin Womens - Clogs Taupe Suede Tapestry - 9 Wide,Women Espadrille Slip-On Boat Flat Shoes Casual Loafer Classic Canvas SIZE 7,Sperry Women's Seaport Penny Loafers, Platinum, 5.5 M US,CHARLOTTE OLYMPIA FANTASY GLITTER KITTY FLAT SHOES 36/6 $565CHRISTIAN LOUBOUTIN-SHOES BOUDIVA PONY DRK LEOPARD NWB SIZE 37.5 $895 MULE,NIB Miu Miu leopard pattern suede leather loafer flat 39 / 9 brand new,NEW ARRIVAL-FINN COMFORT-for sensitive feet 8 - 8 1/2 Womens US (39 EU) P-W-77,Josef Seibel Women's Catalonia 44 Slide Sandal Brandy 37 EU/6-6.5 M US,Eastland Women's Skip Boat Shoe Navy 8 M US,Manolo Blahnik Shoe Low Heel Animal Print Suede Sandal New Size 40 1/2,SPRING STEP FAITH-BGE - FAITH Size: - Color:,NIB Vince Warner Nubuck Leather Platform Slip-On Sneaker Black sz 7.5 (37.5-EU)BX961 MOMA shoes brown leather women moccasins,Softwalk Women's Salina Woven Flat Black 6 M US,Balenciaga New sz 40 9.5 Authentic Designer Womens Flats Espadrilles Shoes black,NIB YSL SAINT LAURENT PARIS LU LU Pony Hair Leopard Oxfords Brogue Flat Shoes 39,GENUINE Tory Burch Wine Red Jolie Ballerina Flats Size 8 - FREE SHIPPING,Premium Walking shoes - Rockport Shoes Lets Walk Ubal,RAS Shoes Pink Leopard Print Smoking Flat Jeweled Bug Embellishments,New sz 7 / 37 Christian Louboutin Leather Rocknbuckle Flat Ankle Sandal Shoes,AUTH BNIB SAINT LAURENT YSL CANVAS BABY CAT FLAT CASUAL WOMEN SHOES 38 SNEAKER,NIB Henry Beguelin Blue Denim Leather platform Sandals , 35.5/5.5NEW CLARKS WOMENS EDENVALE OPAL - WOMENS SHOES - GREY LEATHER,PRADA WOMEN'S ESPADRILLES SLIP ON SHOES NEW WHITE 096,NEW JCREW $248 Double-strap flats in leopard calf hair Size6 F4861,919 Tory Burch Travel Minnie Black Leather Black Logo Ballet Flat Size 9.5 MMUNRO KIERA NATURAL PYTHON PRINT BEIGE 10 M $210 NIB WOMEN LOAFER M206771

by Sep. 21, 2018, 8:37 AM

To conduct their study, the researchers varied the gender composition of a hypothetical bipartisan legislative committee and the decision it made about a policy impacting women’s rights.

The legislative committee was either all male or gender-balanced, and the choice on the docket was either to increase or decrease penalties for workplace sexual harassment. Since the victims of workplace harassment are overwhelmingly female, a decision to increase penalties signified a positive impact for women, while the decision to decrease the penalties would signify a negative impact.

The presence of women legitimizes legislative decisions

For each of the four possible conditions, the survey respondents were asked whether the decision was right for all citizens, whether it was right for women specifically and how fair it was to women.

They found that the public was substantially more likely to perceive a decision negatively impacting women as fair when it was made by a gender balanced committee than when the same decision was made by an all-male committee. The gender composition had no effect on what people thought about the fairness of the decision when it positively impacted women.

While the presence of women in the committee was more likely to increase the perceived legitimacy of the antifeminist decision for everyone, the effect was twice as strong for men.