Stubbs & Wootton (Sz & 9.5) Blue Tan Needlepoint & (Sz Leather Flats Slides Slippers 091f11

Stubbs & Wootton (Sz & 9.5) Blue Tan Needlepoint & (Sz Leather Flats Slides Slippers 091f11

Item specifics

Condition: :
An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: Excellent Clean Fresh Gently-, noting a very-minor insignificant little top spot, and a hint of minor fuzz at the toes, shoes totally present beautifully, "not much"!!!
Country/Region of Manufacture: Spain Brand: Stubbs & Wootton
Width: Medium (B, M) Color: Blue
Style: Loafers Material: Needlepoint
If on a mobile device: expand the description US Shoe Size (Women's): US 9.5
RETURNS: a Quick ship back is requested MPN: Does not apply
UPC: Does not apply

Skip to main content

Stubbs & Wootton (Sz & 9.5) Blue Tan Needlepoint & (Sz Leather Flats Slides Slippers 091f11

Paul Green Black Crystals Kilties Oxford Flat Loafers Moccasins Shoe 6- 8.5,Stephane Kélian Beige Leather Sandals Size 8.5,Frye Women's Sienna Stud Criss Cross Ballet Flats - Pointed Toe Black 7 MEUC Tory Burch Chelsea Ballet Flats Patent Black Leather $278 US 7.5M Sold Out,Balenciaga Paris gray sandals 38.5 US 8.5 flat shoesWomens STELLA McCARTNEY blue / green python print pointy flats sz. 37.5 NEW!,NIB Tory Burch Reva Snake-Embossed Ballet Flat Shoes Pewter 9.5 M style 22158561,See By Chloe Scrunch Women's Nude Leather Zipper Bow Ballet Flats Sz 39,Chloe Susanna Suede Studded leather Flats Shoes UK5.5 38.5 New,Gianvito Rossi BEIGE NAPPA PRALINE 6.5B PUMP  ANKLE TIE NEW IN BOX,RALPH LAUREN Size 10 Off White Knit Ankle Strap Espadrille Wedges,Anne Klein 25026537 Womens Fanetta Synthetic Ballet Flat- Choose SZ/Color.Roger Vivier Chips Ballerinas in Suede Pink - Size 8.5 US - 38.5 Flats,CLARKS Women's Sillian Cala Mary Jane Flat, Navy Synthetic Nubuck, 9.5 N US,Authentic Burberry Pony Hair Loafer Flat Espadrille Size 38/8,Easy Spirit Women's Inglefur Mule Wine/Wine Suede 7.5 M US,Gentleman/Lady NEW RAS WOMENS LOAFERS Promotion At a lower price various kinds,Kenzo Patent Leather White Platform Black Blue Green Shoes Sandals 37 / 7 / 6.5New w/o box PROENZA SCHOULER Espadrilles Sandals Shoes 39/9,NEW $620 DOLCE & GABBANA Shoes Espadrilles Pink Wool Loafers s. EU39 / US8.5,Men/Women Sarah Flint Nancy Women's FLATS Taupe Fine workmanship online shop Diversified new design,NEW MANOLO BLAHNIK Tobaly Ballerina Flats Silver GLITTER Suede 40.5 US,VIONIC Caballo Slip On Shoes - Women's Size 7 BlackROGER VIVIER AUTH $750 Women's Black Leather with front buckle flat shoes Sz 7.5,Lucky Brand Women's Emmie Brindle Persian Leopard Flat 6 MAttilio Giusti Leombruni Women's Black Slip On Leather Flats Sz 39.5,DIOR ITALY Veau Womens Flat Shoes Ballets Silver Leather EUR Sz 40.5 US Sz 10.5,TORY BURCH LIVIA SNAKE WEDGE SANDAL - NEW - SIZE US 9.5 M,NEW VALENTINO GARAVANI BLACK LEATHER ROCKSTUD FLAT GLADIATOR SANDALS SHOES 37CLARKS Unstructured Women's Un.Loop Slip-On,Brown Leather,8.5 N US,

by Sep. 21, 2018, 8:37 AM

To conduct their study, the researchers varied the gender composition of a hypothetical bipartisan legislative committee and the decision it made about a policy impacting women’s rights.

The legislative committee was either all male or gender-balanced, and the choice on the docket was either to increase or decrease penalties for workplace sexual harassment. Since the victims of workplace harassment are overwhelmingly female, a decision to increase penalties signified a positive impact for women, while the decision to decrease the penalties would signify a negative impact.

The presence of women legitimizes legislative decisions

For each of the four possible conditions, the survey respondents were asked whether the decision was right for all citizens, whether it was right for women specifically and how fair it was to women.

They found that the public was substantially more likely to perceive a decision negatively impacting women as fair when it was made by a gender balanced committee than when the same decision was made by an all-male committee. The gender composition had no effect on what people thought about the fairness of the decision when it positively impacted women.

While the presence of women in the committee was more likely to increase the perceived legitimacy of the antifeminist decision for everyone, the effect was twice as strong for men.