NikeID Air Force 8.5 1 Golden State Women’s Size 8.5 Force COBALT/YELLOW AQ3994-991 31c0be

NikeID Air Force 8.5 1 Golden State Women’s Size 8.5 Force COBALT/YELLOW AQ3994-991 31c0be

Item specifics

New without box: A brand-new, un, and un item (including handmade items) that is not in original packaging or ... Read moreabout the condition
Look: Textured
Country/Region of Manufacture: China Brand:


Material: Leather Product Line: Air Force 1
Style: Low Top Theme: Team
Pattern: Solid Activity: Walking
Width: Medium (B, M) US Shoe Size (Women's): US 8.5/UK 6.5/EU 39



Does not apply

Skip to main content

NikeID Air Force 8.5 1 Golden State Women’s Size 8.5 Force COBALT/YELLOW AQ3994-991 31c0be

ADIDAS NEMEZIZ 17+ 360 AGILITY FG SOCCER CLEATS CORE BLACK CP8930 MEN SIZE 8.5,Nike Air Max Sequent 3 Women's White/White/Vast Grey/Hot Punch J0005101,nike zoom winflo 3 women’s 8.5 Baby BlueNIB Nike Juvenate Sneakers Shoe Palm Legion Olive Green 724979-309 Womens Sz 6,Nike Womens Free 4.0 Flyknit Athletic Shoe Fuchsia/Black/Violet 717076-500 5-11,NIB Nike Air Zoom Pegasus 34 Running Shoe 880560-406 Blue Pink Womens Sz 6 6.5 9,Adidas Men’s Sz 13 Freak Kevlar Football Cleats New Blue Midi Shoes Dipped,Nike Women Air Max 95 Size 9 SE Confetti Vast Grey Habanero QS 918413-004,Womens NIKE AIR MAX 90 PRM Bronze Brown Trainers 896497 901Nike Women's Air Max 1 Ultra 2.0 Si Running ShoeNike WMNS Air Max 1 Mid Sneakerboot women lifestyle winter sneakers NEW blackWmns Nike Air Max 1 ID 823375 993 Silver Size 11 WomenSALE NIKE AIR MAX 1 NS WOMENS WMNS 844982 101 SZ 6-10 NEW OFF WHITE HYPER VIOLET,Nike Classic Cortez Goddess Of Victory Womens AR5393-400 Ocean Shoes Size 6.5NIKE AIR MAX ZERO LOTC QS SZ: WMNS 10 (847125 600),Nike Womens Rosherun Flyknit Running Trainers 704927 Sneakers Shoes 400New Nike Women's Free RN Flyknit Athletic Shoe White/Black 880844-003 **Adidas Superstar W Women's Basketball Shoes White s85139,Nike Air Zoom Odyssey 2 Purple Lilac Size 6.5 Women's Running ShoesWomens Nike Air Force 1 '07 TXT Shoes 845113 800 Peach Cream/Total Orange SZ 10Nike Mayfly Woven Suede Lilac Purple PLUM FOG, MEDIUM BROWN & SAIL NEW 8 $120Nike Women's Tanjun Racer Running Shoe Aurora Green/Ssil-Iced Jade 8.5,WMNS Nike Air Jordan Modero 1 SZ 5 Particle Beige Pink Sandal Slide AO9919-200,WMNS Nike Flex Run 2017 Mesh Running Shoes Black Blue Pink 898476-004 SZ New,Women’s Nike Court Borough Retro Black/White Red Size 7 844906-100 Blazer Jordan,Nike Air Max Thea Print Women's Shoes Size 8,634835-108 NIKE AIR HUARACHE RUN WHITE WOMENS SNEAKER SIZE 5NIKE WMNS METCON 3 AMP 849808-003 Black/Metallic Gold (WOMEN'S 10) *NO BOX*,Nike W Renew Rival [AA7411-602] Women Casual Shoes Bright Crimson/Black,Nike Womens Air Zoom Shoes 863766-001 Black Sz 8.5 W,

by Sep. 21, 2018, 8:37 AM

To conduct their study, the researchers varied the gender composition of a hypothetical bipartisan legislative committee and the decision it made about a policy impacting women’s rights.

The legislative committee was either all male or gender-balanced, and the choice on the docket was either to increase or decrease penalties for workplace sexual harassment. Since the victims of workplace harassment are overwhelmingly female, a decision to increase penalties signified a positive impact for women, while the decision to decrease the penalties would signify a negative impact.

The presence of women legitimizes legislative decisions

For each of the four possible conditions, the survey respondents were asked whether the decision was right for all citizens, whether it was right for women specifically and how fair it was to women.

They found that the public was substantially more likely to perceive a decision negatively impacting women as fair when it was made by a gender balanced committee than when the same decision was made by an all-male committee. The gender composition had no effect on what people thought about the fairness of the decision when it positively impacted women.

While the presence of women in the committee was more likely to increase the perceived legitimacy of the antifeminist decision for everyone, the effect was twice as strong for men.