Jessica Simpson 6.5 Womens Black Espadrilles Size 6.5 Simpson (407620) f06b42

Jessica Simpson 6.5 Womens Black Espadrilles Size 6.5 Simpson (407620) f06b42

Item specifics

Condition: New without box :
A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) that is not in original packaging or may be missing original packaging materials (such as the original box or bag). The original tags may not be attached. For example, new shoes (with absolutely no signs of wear) that are no longer in their original box fall into this category. See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: Shoes are in Brand New Condition Without Original Box and / Or Original Box is not in New Condition. Bottoms have brand new condition. Insoles have brand new condition. Uppers have brand new condition
Brand: Jessica Simpson Material: Suede
Style: Espadrille Color: Black
MPN: 407620 US Shoe Size (Women's): 6.5
Width: Medium (B, M) UPC: Does not apply

Skip to main content

Jessica Simpson 6.5 Womens Black Espadrilles Size 6.5 Simpson (407620) f06b42

Clark’s WHITE LEA RODE Women’s Leather Sandal 6.5mIndigo Clarks 82977 Brown Leather Faux Croc 1 Inch Wedge Loafers Size 8.5 M,Seychelles Womens Bed and Breakfast Ballet Flat- Pick SZ/Color.,Rockport truwalk Zero Women's Mary Jane Walking Shoe Pastel Parchment/Rose Sz 10,Women's Sperry Top Sider Driving Ballet Slippers Size 6.5 (B,M) Casual Solid Bla,Clarks 38213 Womens Brown Leather Casual Slip On Moc Toe Clogs Shoe Slides Sz 6M,DANSKO SZ 7.5 8 M 38 BLACK LEATHER CLOGS LOAFERS PLATFORM SHOES,Skechers Women's, Vaso Bonita Slip On Shoes,Style & Co. Womens Audreyy Round Toe Ballet Flats,Keds for Neiman Marcus: Silver Sequin Slip-on Sneaker-Women's Size 5 1/2 M,Grasshoppers Womens Windham Closed Toe Loafers, Peacoat Navy, Size 7.0 QIZCWOMENS GENTLY WORN TWICE "EARTH ORIGINS" BROWN LOAFERS SIZE 7 M EXCELLENTBOBS from Skechers Women's B-Loved-Engineered Knit FlatKelly & Katie Womens Cigola Pointed Toe Loafers light pink Size 11.0 3qul,British Loafers Slip On Block Platform Shoes Oxford Round Toe Girls Casual Shoes,Aerosoles Women's SO Soft Slip-On White Combination 8 M US 8 B(M) USAravon New Balance Farren Brown Leather Oxfords Sneakers 9.5B $135 Women's,Calvin Klein Womens Elin Black Smoking Loafers Shoes 6 Medium (B,M) BHFO 1286,Merrell Luxe Wrap Brown Leather Clogs Mules Studded Heel Shoes Women's Size 8,Leisure Womens Cute Pointed Toe Dot Slip on Loafers Walking Shoes Slippers WorkNEW Urban Outfitters Suzi Suede Ballet Flat Women Shoes Red Rouge Yellow Juane 7,SAKS FIFTH AVENUE - women's suede loafer/driving shoes size 10 OrangeCasual Womens Brogues Wingtip Platform Patent Leather Creeper Sports Shoes PumpsKenneth Cole REACTION Women's Rain Down 2 Metallic Mule Slip on Loafer Flat,Ollio Women's Shoe Ballet Light Faux Suede Mary Jane Flats Taupe 10 M US,Merrell Purple Nylon Mesh Sneakers Size 8.5 1/2 Shoes,Man's/Woman's Stuart Weitzman Wedge Loafers Size 8.5 Promotion Won highly appreciated and widely trusted at home and abroad Exquisite processing,Women's Clarks Keesha Luca Black Patent Leather Slip-on Loafers Size 8.5 W,Barefoot Freedom by Drew GENEVA Denim Leather/Nubuck Therapeutic Shoe 8.5 Narrow,Office Ladies Flat Heel Slip On Pumps Shoes Womens Dating Loafer Plus Size 34-51,

by Sep. 21, 2018, 8:37 AM

To conduct their study, the researchers varied the gender composition of a hypothetical bipartisan legislative committee and the decision it made about a policy impacting women’s rights.

The legislative committee was either all male or gender-balanced, and the choice on the docket was either to increase or decrease penalties for workplace sexual harassment. Since the victims of workplace harassment are overwhelmingly female, a decision to increase penalties signified a positive impact for women, while the decision to decrease the penalties would signify a negative impact.

The presence of women legitimizes legislative decisions

For each of the four possible conditions, the survey respondents were asked whether the decision was right for all citizens, whether it was right for women specifically and how fair it was to women.

They found that the public was substantially more likely to perceive a decision negatively impacting women as fair when it was made by a gender balanced committee than when the same decision was made by an all-male committee. The gender composition had no effect on what people thought about the fairness of the decision when it positively impacted women.

While the presence of women in the committee was more likely to increase the perceived legitimacy of the antifeminist decision for everyone, the effect was twice as strong for men.