Cole Haan Cheetah Leopard (M, Flats Size US 9 Regular (M, Leopard B) f7f8bb

Cole Haan Cheetah Leopard (M, Flats Size US 9 Regular (M, Leopard B) f7f8bb

Gently used

This item has visible signs of wear

In great condition with leather soles

Listed by:  Hawt Hangers

Responds within: 24 hrs

Ask a Question

Brand:

Cole Haan

Heel Height:

Flat

Size:

US 9

Style/Collection:

Cole Hann cheetah leopard flats

Width:

Regular (M, B)

Type:

Flats

Style Tags:

Cole Haan Flats


Skip to main content

Cole Haan Cheetah Leopard (M, Flats Size US 9 Regular (M, Leopard B) f7f8bb

Sergio Rossi Red Leather Ankle with Goring Inserts Boots/Booties Size EU 38.5 (Approx. US 8.5) Regular (M, B),Prada Brown Suede Calzature Wedges Size EU 36.5 (Approx. US 6.5) Regular (M, B),Brunello Cucinelli Burgundy Patent Leather Chelsea Boots/Booties Size US 7 Regular (M, B),Tory Burch Black Marion Quilted Sandals Size US 10.5 Regular (M, B),Tory Burch Boxwood Cooper Boots/Booties Size US 9 Regular (M, B)Dolce&Gabbana Brown Crystal Flower Lemon Print Sandals Size EU 39 (Approx. US 9) Regular (M, B),Rag & Bone Black Wyatt Suede Sandals Boots/Booties Size US 8 Regular (M, B)Zara Nude Floral Embroidered Leather Peep Sandals Size US 8 Regular (M, B)See by Chloé Black Pumps Size US 8 Regular (M, B),Stuart Weitzman Pink And White Suede Sandals Size US 11 Regular (M, B),Tory Burch Banana Canvas Flip Flop Sandals Size US 8 Regular (M, B),Christian Louboutin Gold Sahara Metallic Platine Marilla Woven Flats A917 Sandals Size EU 38.5 (Approx. US 8.5) Regular (M, B)Alexander McQueen Iridescent Indigo Patent Leather Pumps Size US 7 Regular (M, B),Saint Laurent Black Silver New Vegeta Wedges Size EU 39 (Approx. US 9) Regular (M, B),Hunter Marigold Boots/Booties Size US 6 Regular (M, B),Dolce&Gabbana Dolce & Gabbana Crocodile Leather Sandals Black Pumps Size US 9 Regular (M, B),Prada Brown Wedges Boots/Booties Size US 8 Regular (M, B),Giuseppe Zanotti Gold Yvette 110mm Pumps Size US 7.5 Regular (M, B)Isabel Marant Black New Leather Ankle Heel Boots/Booties Size EU 38 (Approx. US 8) Regular (M, B),Loeffler Randall Gray Boots/Booties Size US 8 Regular (M, B)Jeffrey Campbell Black Becca Flats Size US 7 Regular (M, B),Stuart Weitzman Black Boots/Booties Size US 7.5 Regular (M, B),adidas Limited Edition B72717 Sneakers Size US 6.5 Regular (M, B),Free People Grey Cecil Block Heel Velvet Boots/Booties Size EU 38 (Approx. US 8) Regular (M, B),Burberry Brown Leather Cross Strap Espadrille Wedge Sandals Size EU 37 (Approx. US 7) Regular (M, B),Jeffrey Campbell Black Leather Metcalf Pearl Caged Heel Boots/Booties Size US 5 Regular (M, B)Prada Ivory Cherry Two Tone Patent Leather Bow Vamp T-strap Runway Pumps Sandals Size EU 41.5 (Approx. US 11.5) Regular (M, B)Jimmy Choo Fuchsia Lance Sandal New Pumps Size EU 40.5 (Approx. US 10.5) Regular (M, B),Tory Burch Yellow Ashton Sandals Size US 8 Regular (M, B)Stuart Weitzman Taupe / Brown 'reins' Wedge/ Sandal Platforms Size US 9.5 Regular (M, B),

by Sep. 21, 2018, 8:37 AM

To conduct their study, the researchers varied the gender composition of a hypothetical bipartisan legislative committee and the decision it made about a policy impacting women’s rights.

The legislative committee was either all male or gender-balanced, and the choice on the docket was either to increase or decrease penalties for workplace sexual harassment. Since the victims of workplace harassment are overwhelmingly female, a decision to increase penalties signified a positive impact for women, while the decision to decrease the penalties would signify a negative impact.

The presence of women legitimizes legislative decisions

For each of the four possible conditions, the survey respondents were asked whether the decision was right for all citizens, whether it was right for women specifically and how fair it was to women.

They found that the public was substantially more likely to perceive a decision negatively impacting women as fair when it was made by a gender balanced committee than when the same decision was made by an all-male committee. The gender composition had no effect on what people thought about the fairness of the decision when it positively impacted women.

While the presence of women in the committee was more likely to increase the perceived legitimacy of the antifeminist decision for everyone, the effect was twice as strong for men.