Women's White Propet White Pink 10.5 3902 Diabetic Strap Shoes 10.5 Pink EE - New in Box 7510c3

Women's White Propet White Pink 10.5 3902 Diabetic Strap Shoes 10.5 Pink EE - New in Box 7510c3

Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, 你, and 我 item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: Propet
Fastening: Hook & Loop Strap US Shoe Size (Women's): 10.5
Country/Region of Manufacture: China Style: Walking, Hiking, Trail
Model: W3902 Width: Extra Wide (EE+)
UPC: Does Not Apply Material: Leather
Gender: Women Heel Height: Flat (0 to 1/2 in.)
Features & Fastening: Hook & Loop Strap Color: White

Skip to main content

Women's White Propet White Pink 10.5 3902 Diabetic Strap Shoes 10.5 Pink EE - New in Box 7510c3

Womens folk-custom Leather Round Toe Platform Wedge Heels Buckle Creepers Shoes,B2 Auth DOLCE & GABBANA Coral/Wht Leather Crystal Tassels Moccasins Shoes Sz 38Gentleman/Lady plantation Shoes 619532 Pink M Beautiful design Online Famous store,Man's/Woman's Romika Women's Banja 15 Platform Pump Many varieties Known for its good quality Fashion versatile shoesnew CLAUDIA CIUTI "Flavie" brown suede BUCKLED shoes FLATS - super cuteFRYE Women's Erica Venetian Slip-On Loafer, Dark Brown, Size 6.0 afCZ,Anne Klein Women's Alphia Light Green Multi Fabric Ballet FlatRIEKER LADIES GREY COMBINATION NUBUCK LOAFER 42150,J.Crew Orange Suede Gold Studded Spikes Ballet Flats Shoes Sz 10,Men/Women Wonen’s loafer Strong heat and wear resistance Stylish and fun Exquisite (processing) processingCole Haan Women's Gilmore MJ Ballet Mary Jane Flats - Gray MANY SIZE New,Walking Cradles Womens flick Closed Toe Slide Flats Tan Size 6.5,Sarah Flint Bennet Loafers Black Suede Leather Flats Size 41 $495 Meghan Markle,Gentleman/Lady Cole hann shoes women Durable service Selected materials Non-slip,TORY BURCH Reva US 6.5 Ballet Flats Medallion Black Patent Leather Shoes $238 A6,Gentlemen/Ladies Sperry Top-Sider Women's Angelfish,Linen/Oat,8 W US Aesthetic appearance comfortability Exquisite processing,Sperry Top-Sider Women's Authentic Original 2-Eye Brown/Tan Loafers & Slip-OnsBOTTEGA VENETA brown suede bow woven Ballet flats shoes sz 7B,Marc Joseph New York New Grand Street Red Womens Shoes Size 5 M Flats MSRP $145,Womens Vagabond Amina Patent Leather Work Office Flat Closed Toe Shoes,Softinos Ita 298 Black Womens Loafers Washed Look Leather Upper,AK Anne Klein Sport 25029122 Womens Glinda Velvet Ankle- Choose SZ/Color.,Men's/Women's Ricophelia Shoes 527603 GreyxMulticolor 24.5cm Crazy price a wide range of products Exquisite processing,Men/Women TBS Jazaru Nuage Cheap Clearance At an affordable price,E18-SGF WOMEN'S SHOES 36 BALLET FLATS court SGARIGLIA LUIGI BLUE MADE IN ITALY,NEW Women's SAS Simple Antique Wine Leather Casual Slip On Comfort ShoeRobert Clergerie Paris Women's Black Leather Platform Wedges Loafers Sz 6B,DANSKO WOMENS CLOGS PRO Rare Color Croc Gold/Brown PATENT SIZE 9.5-10~NEW!,Mark Schwartz Black Leather Calf hair Mules Clogs Flats size 6SAS 8 Narrow Gray Loafer Slip On Women's,

by Sep. 21, 2018, 8:37 AM

To conduct their study, the researchers varied the gender composition of a hypothetical bipartisan legislative committee and the decision it made about a policy impacting women’s rights.

The legislative committee was either all male or gender-balanced, and the choice on the docket was either to increase or decrease penalties for workplace sexual harassment. Since the victims of workplace harassment are overwhelmingly female, a decision to increase penalties signified a positive impact for women, while the decision to decrease the penalties would signify a negative impact.

The presence of women legitimizes legislative decisions

For each of the four possible conditions, the survey respondents were asked whether the decision was right for all citizens, whether it was right for women specifically and how fair it was to women.

They found that the public was substantially more likely to perceive a decision negatively impacting women as fair when it was made by a gender balanced committee than when the same decision was made by an all-male committee. The gender composition had no effect on what people thought about the fairness of the decision when it positively impacted women.

While the presence of women in the committee was more likely to increase the perceived legitimacy of the antifeminist decision for everyone, the effect was twice as strong for men.