Munro Women's Black Shoes Leather Shoes Black 8 M dc36f5

Munro Women's Black Shoes Leather Shoes Black 8 M dc36f5

Item specifics

Condition: New without box :
A brand-new, 你, and 我 item (including handmade items) that is not in original packaging or may be missing original packaging materials (such as the original box or bag). The original tags may not be attached. For example, new shoes (with absolutely no signs of wear) that are no longer in their original box fall into this category. See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: Store display model
Brand: Munro US Shoe Size (Women's): 8
Color: Black Heel Height: Med (1 3/4 in. to 2 3/4 in.)
Width: Medium (B, M) Style: Mary Janes
UPC: Does not apply

Skip to main content

Munro Women's Black Shoes Leather Shoes Black 8 M dc36f5

Cole Haan Womens Tamirasam Closed Toe Ballet Flats, Pink, Size 6.0,JOIE Brown $228 LEATHER Diya Slip On Sneakers Size 8.5 NIB 60% OFF,TOD'S Vintage Nilo City Moccasin Flat Size 6 Natural Canvas w Brown Leather TrimHush Puppies Women's Lara Bria in Black,Man/Woman French Sole Close Slingback Flat Customer first Medium cost high quality product,French Sole Jigsaw Black Womens Shoes Size 9 M Flats MSRP $200,NWB JCrew $118 Gemma Suede Flats with Pom-Poms Sz 6 Green Pointed Ballet G0877Man/Woman Flat Nine West Shelomi Soft Gold High security Online export store Elegant and solemn,J Crew JCrew Flats Shoes 12 12M 12B 42,Man/Woman UNIF Edge Platform Loafers, Size 7 main category new Excellent stretchingTod's Loafers Moccasin Driving Shoes Women Size 38.5,Marc Joseph New York Women's East Village Loafer Navy Grainy 7 M USMan's/Woman's J/Slides - Astor - Black Satin High quality and low overhead Won highly appreciated and widely trusted at home and abroad Different styles,tods gold driving moccasins loafers flat slip on 39 9 garconne anthropologie apc,Klogs Landing Womens Clog Shoes Slate 7 MBOUTIQUE 9 NEEKKO Multi-Colored Suede Designer Flats Comfort 5.5 M,Stubbs & Wootton Black Velvet Loafers W/Martinis Women’s 7.5 $500,Soludos Women's Ciao Bella Espadrille Smoking Slippers AB4 Blush Size 9,French Sole Womens ZEPPA Closed Toe Casual Platform Sandals,Nine West Women's Nevie Leather Oxford, Black, 5.5 M USPlanet Shoes Lamp Womens Comfortable Leather Slip On Flat Shoes,Gentleman/Lady MISSONI Patterned Flats 39 Guarantee quality and quantity online shop Easy life,ABEO SMART SYSTEM MARY JANES DOUBLE LEATHER STRAP 3- D DIGITAL DESIGN 3510>6.5?Dr. Martens Women`s 1461 Aggy Agyness Deyn Blucher Loafer Blue US 5,TORY BURCH WOMEN BALLET FLAT STRAW LEATHER SIZE 7 BLACK,Arcopedico Flower Mary Jane Flats Bronze Brown Leather Women's Shoe Size 36 6,Cole Haan Pin Lte Womens Weekender Loafer B - M- Choose SZ/Color.,KMB Shoes Slippers Slip On Notturno Gold Glitter Textile Rubber Leather,Dr. Martens 9491 Knee High boots US men 4 women 5 Black and white,MERRELL JUNGLE MOC AC+ Casual Slip-on Shoes Women's 8 NEW

by Sep. 21, 2018, 8:37 AM

To conduct their study, the researchers varied the gender composition of a hypothetical bipartisan legislative committee and the decision it made about a policy impacting women’s rights.

The legislative committee was either all male or gender-balanced, and the choice on the docket was either to increase or decrease penalties for workplace sexual harassment. Since the victims of workplace harassment are overwhelmingly female, a decision to increase penalties signified a positive impact for women, while the decision to decrease the penalties would signify a negative impact.

The presence of women legitimizes legislative decisions

For each of the four possible conditions, the survey respondents were asked whether the decision was right for all citizens, whether it was right for women specifically and how fair it was to women.

They found that the public was substantially more likely to perceive a decision negatively impacting women as fair when it was made by a gender balanced committee than when the same decision was made by an all-male committee. The gender composition had no effect on what people thought about the fairness of the decision when it positively impacted women.

While the presence of women in the committee was more likely to increase the perceived legitimacy of the antifeminist decision for everyone, the effect was twice as strong for men.