Birkenstock Women Clog Shoes 240 Size 6 Black Style 240 Shoes Made Germany. 808169

Birkenstock Women Clog Shoes 240 Size 6 Black Style 240 Shoes Made Germany. 808169

Item specifics

Condition: :
An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: Very Good Condition. No Major Flaws Or Defects. See Photos For Details.
Style: Clogs Brand: Birkenstock
US Shoe Size (Women's): 6 Pattern: Solid
Color: Black Country/Region of Manufacture: Germany
Material: Rubber Occasion: Casual
UPC: Does not apply

Skip to main content

Birkenstock Women Clog Shoes 240 Size 6 Black Style 240 Shoes Made Germany. 808169

Womens Naturalizer NIB Leana Youth Blue Flats 4 MWomen's Fur Flower Winter Warm Stylish Wedge Hidden Heels Casual Comfort SHoesNEW DONALD J PLINER BOLI LEATHER Size 6.5 BLACK FLATS CRINKLE BALLET WOMEN SHOES,Original SAS Simplify Black Leather WW Extra Wide 1550-013 Women,Sperry Top-Sider Women’s Angelfish Tan Leather Boat Shoes Size 5Crown Vintage Womens Neal Leather Closed Toe Slide Flats, vodka suede, Size 6.5,Giani Bernini Womens Odeysa2 Leather Round Toe Slide Flats,Man's/Woman's KICKERS Oxfork Gris Python High-quality Known for its good quality Brand feast,Kensie Chica flat oxford Nice Sexy Comfortable Styllish $119 6Rare Lanvin Black Leather Pony Hair Ballet Flats 39 US 8,NEW J.CREW KIKI BALLET FLATS IN PAINTED PANSY, F8149, SIZE 8.5, WARM MULTI, $168,Dr Martens Woolrich Womens Shoe Sz 8 Black Fabric T-Strap Buckle Maryjane FlatsEileen Fisher Black Leather Slip On Fashion Sneakers Womens Size US 7M,Men/Women PRAIRIE UNDERGROUND Hemp Form Good world reputation First grade in its class Most practicalMan/Woman TORY BURCH WOMENS SHOES SIZE 11M Not so expensive Strong value Beautiful and charming,Munro Jerrie Women's Black Suede Slip On Flats US Size 7N Item #A80,Sperry Top-Sider Avery Flat Loafers, Black Leather, 8.5 US / 39.5 EU,The Original Car Shoe By Prada Learher Loafer Driving Shoes Womens Size 41/10.5,AGL Attilio Giusti Leombruni Perforated Peep Toe Wedge Shoes Leather Brown 9.5,Gentleman/Lady MUSTANG Boots 1283505 Marine Many styles International choice Full range of specifications,J Slides Men's Danny Sneaker, Brown Suede, 13 Medium US,Man/Woman ladies Rieker Shoes 40089-W Excellent craft discount Cost-effective,Ecco Women’s Knit Pink-Beetroot/Fandango Golf Casual Hybrid Size US 6-6.5,Mr/Ms *GIANVITTO ROSSI* BLACK SUEDE SHOES (38.5) Many varieties First quality wonderfulNurture Farrin Crossband Black Sneakers Size 8 Women,Tory Burch Blue Suede Reva Ballet Flats with Large Gold Tone Logo Size 6.5",Earthies Clare - Women's Ballet Flat Spicy Red - 8 Medium,Men's/Women's Women’s 11 Munro American Red Shoes Crazy price, Birmingham luxurious Suitable for colorTORY BURCH Women Color Block Flat Espadrilles Mestico Size 8M Bright Azalea, Red,Earth Anise Women's Black Leather Slip On Loafer Comfort Shoes 7.5 B / M,

by Sep. 21, 2018, 8:37 AM

To conduct their study, the researchers varied the gender composition of a hypothetical bipartisan legislative committee and the decision it made about a policy impacting women’s rights.

The legislative committee was either all male or gender-balanced, and the choice on the docket was either to increase or decrease penalties for workplace sexual harassment. Since the victims of workplace harassment are overwhelmingly female, a decision to increase penalties signified a positive impact for women, while the decision to decrease the penalties would signify a negative impact.

The presence of women legitimizes legislative decisions

For each of the four possible conditions, the survey respondents were asked whether the decision was right for all citizens, whether it was right for women specifically and how fair it was to women.

They found that the public was substantially more likely to perceive a decision negatively impacting women as fair when it was made by a gender balanced committee than when the same decision was made by an all-male committee. The gender composition had no effect on what people thought about the fairness of the decision when it positively impacted women.

While the presence of women in the committee was more likely to increase the perceived legitimacy of the antifeminist decision for everyone, the effect was twice as strong for men.