JIMMY CHOO Taupe Snakeskin Pointed Toe Ballet Flats Size 5.5 35.5 Ballet EUC! 072791

JIMMY CHOO Taupe Snakeskin Pointed Toe Ballet  Flats Size 5.5 35.5  Ballet EUC! 072791

Item specifics

Condition: :
An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: excellent condition. some wear on sole. See photos
Look: Designer Fastening: Slip On
Brand: Jimmy Choo Theme: Designer
Toe Type: Pointed Toe US Shoe Size (Women's): US 5.5
Modified Item: No EUR Shoe Size (Women's): EUR 35.5
Model: Flats UK Shoe Size (Women's): UK 2.5
Heel Height: Flat (0 to 1/2 in.) Pattern: Solid
Style: Ballet Flats Occasion: Casual
Material: Snakeskin Heel Type: flat
Country/Region of Manufacture: Italy Width: Medium (B, M)
Color: Beige MPN: Does Not Apply
UPC: Does not apply

Skip to main content

JIMMY CHOO Taupe Snakeskin Pointed Toe Ballet Flats Size 5.5 35.5 Ballet EUC! 072791

Circus by Sam Edelman Women's Rocco Mary Jane Flat Black/Multi/Metallic Flora...'Ladies Rieker' Rounded Toe Slip On Casual Shoes - 41385,JEAN-MICHEL CAZABAT Women's Zesta Wedge - Tan - Multi SZ NIB - MSRP $295!CHRISTIAN DIOR multicolored floral silk ballet flat size 39,NEW **CLARKS** "Whistle Bamboo" Slip On Black Leather Shoe, 7.5 MYosi Samra Ballet Flat - Deep Blue Size US 5,Dansko Oksana Leather Loafer Black Women Sz 38Gentleman/Lady Ellie 5Inch Platform Court Shoe Black Best-selling worldwide King of quantity Known for its beautiful quality,Men/Women Sperry Top-Sider Women's AngelfishLinen/Oat7.5 M US Packaging diversity the most economical Very good classification,Women's Oxfords Casual Slide Slip On Loafers Pumps Flats Soft Cow Leather Shoes,NEW Clarks Women's Candra Glow Flats, Burgundy Suede, 5 US, M,Mercanti Fiorentini Women's 9.5B String Tie Driving Moccasin Loafer Leather Shoe,STEVEN by Steve Madden Women's Lavender Loafer Flat Black Suede US 7.5,3.1 Phillip Lim JASPER Embroidered Loafer, Black Leather Size EUR37 or EUR39Merrell Encore Q2 Breeze (Women's) Slip On Shoe. AluminumAerosoles Women's Mr Softee, Black Dark Pink Suede 7.5 M USNaturalizer Womens emiline Leather Almond Toe Loafers,Lambertson Truex Merrit Suede Softee Brown Cognac Loafer Slip On Shoes 7.5,SAS "FREETIME " Mocha/Brown Leather Comfort Loafer Shoes NIB sz 10 S USA madeWomen's Shoe Clarks Azella Theoni Snake Print Espadrille Slip On 25832 Beige New,Gentleman/Lady Lana pointed-toe Ballet Flat Rich design Price reduction Various latest designs,Gentlemen/Ladies Aerosoles Women's Sidewalk Loafer Reliable quality Upper material Different styles and styles,Paul Mayer Attitudes Brill Brighton Women's FLATS Silver/Plata,RALPH LAUREN Soft Red Leather Classic Low Heel Loafer Shoes 7.5 AA Italy Rare!,DKNY Stunning Slip ON Ballet Flats, Black, 6.5 US / 37 EU,SAS Freetime Women's Bone Leather Walking/Work Shoe Diabetic Approved 6.5 Wide,Jambu WJ16SPT45 Womens Spirit-Vegan Flat- Choose SZ/Color.,New! Clarks Artisan Slip On Sculpted Wedge Double Strap Shoes Brown Sz 10M,Maison Margiela MM6 Women's Distressed Leather Oxfords Flat Shoes US 6 IT 37,Gentlemen/Ladies Womens Fendi Selleria Brown Shoes 39.5 economic online shop Authentic guarantee

by Sep. 21, 2018, 8:37 AM

To conduct their study, the researchers varied the gender composition of a hypothetical bipartisan legislative committee and the decision it made about a policy impacting women’s rights.

The legislative committee was either all male or gender-balanced, and the choice on the docket was either to increase or decrease penalties for workplace sexual harassment. Since the victims of workplace harassment are overwhelmingly female, a decision to increase penalties signified a positive impact for women, while the decision to decrease the penalties would signify a negative impact.

The presence of women legitimizes legislative decisions

For each of the four possible conditions, the survey respondents were asked whether the decision was right for all citizens, whether it was right for women specifically and how fair it was to women.

They found that the public was substantially more likely to perceive a decision negatively impacting women as fair when it was made by a gender balanced committee than when the same decision was made by an all-male committee. The gender composition had no effect on what people thought about the fairness of the decision when it positively impacted women.

While the presence of women in the committee was more likely to increase the perceived legitimacy of the antifeminist decision for everyone, the effect was twice as strong for men.