Dr Martens 1461 Vegan Vegetarian Shoes Pascal Metallic Silver Snake Shoes Vegetarian 448141

Dr Martens 1461 Vegan Vegetarian Shoes Pascal Metallic Silver Snake Shoes Vegetarian 448141

Item specifics

New with box: A brand-new, 你, and 我 item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: Dr Martens
Upper Material: Vegan EU Shoe Size: See conversion chart on listing description
Pattern: Reptile Actual Colours Available: Silver
Sole: Synthetic Actual Material: Metallic Snake - PU coated + metallic embossed Reptile Print
Product ID: 23732040 Occasion: Casual
Width: Standard (B) Features: Slip resistant, Cushioned, Goodyear Welted Air Cushioned Sole
MPN: 23732040 Style: Lace-up
Country/Region of Manufacture: China

Skip to main content

Dr Martens 1461 Vegan Vegetarian Shoes Pascal Metallic Silver Snake Shoes Vegetarian 448141

Indigo Rd. Womens Harts Leather Cap Toe Oxfords, DARK GREY, Size 7.0,New Donald J Pliner 10 Black Microfiber Leather Slip On Shoes Wedge Heel Loafer,Rockport Atarah Laser Cap Toe Flat-Women's Size 9 Mocha,Lanvin Brown Leather w/ Black Patent Leather Cap Toe Ballet Flats/Shoes Size 40,Men/Women Joie Faux Fur Lined Mules 9.5 Every item described is available Carefully selected materials Different stylesHaflinger Womens Olivia Clog/Mule 39 (US 8) M- Pick SZ/Color.,COLE HAAN Size 7.5 Navy Blue Ballet Wedge Shoes 7 1/2 N. AirCrocs lina embellished ballet flat navy Size 4.5 US,Mr/Ms LADIES SHOES/FOOTWEAR -CABELLO 961 BLACK SHOE Consumer first the most economical Preferential priceGEOX RESPIRA 41 BEIGE LEATHER SLIP ON HORSEBIT DRIVING SHOE MOC WOMEN USA 10.5 M,Man/Woman FitFlop Womens F-Sporty Penny Loafer Shoes Easy to clean surface Sales Italy Suitable for color,Paul Mayer Attitudes Cozy Ballet Flat - Black Size US 6.5 B,AMALFI by Rangoni Black/Silver Loafers w/Red/Blue Stripe & Metal Buckles 6.5MDr. Martens Bennett 5-Eye Oxford Chestnut Brown Leather Women's Size 5,Dark Purple Suede DANSKO Elasticized DANSKO Mary Jane Shoes US 9.5 - 10,Clarks Women's Channing Kim Flats in Black,JCrew $188 Charlie Loafers in Wool Flannel Sz 7 Heather Charcoal Shoes F8007,Star Wars C3PO Irregular Choice Womens Loafers Flats Shoes 9.5MEPHISTO Linda Wo's 8M Black Stretch Gore-Tex Knee Rain Boot Side Zip Wedge Heel,ECCO Women's Intrinsic Karma Flat Slip on Shoes Lemon US 9-9.58100 Melrose Brown Suede A-Line Loafer Size 40Gentle Souls Women's Bay Unique Ballerina Multicolor Flats US Size 5.5 M $210,Botle Spring Step L'Artiste Collection Women's Sandal Turquoise Multi US 7New Real Leather Buckle Tassel Platform Loafers Round Toe Casual Shoes Womens SZMerrell Women's Dassie Fold Slide J02152 Bracken Size 8,Sperry Women's Seaside Nautical Perf Shoes Size 10,Juicy Couture Brown and Snake Ballet Flats,Dr. Martens Women`s 1461 Aggy Agyness Deyn Blucher Loafer Blue US 5,Ed Ellen Degeneres Lolena Oxford- Women's Size 8M - Black,Hot Chocolate Design Chocolaticas Simonette Women's Mary Jane Flat Multicoloured,

by Sep. 21, 2018, 8:37 AM

To conduct their study, the researchers varied the gender composition of a hypothetical bipartisan legislative committee and the decision it made about a policy impacting women’s rights.

The legislative committee was either all male or gender-balanced, and the choice on the docket was either to increase or decrease penalties for workplace sexual harassment. Since the victims of workplace harassment are overwhelmingly female, a decision to increase penalties signified a positive impact for women, while the decision to decrease the penalties would signify a negative impact.

The presence of women legitimizes legislative decisions

For each of the four possible conditions, the survey respondents were asked whether the decision was right for all citizens, whether it was right for women specifically and how fair it was to women.

They found that the public was substantially more likely to perceive a decision negatively impacting women as fair when it was made by a gender balanced committee than when the same decision was made by an all-male committee. The gender composition had no effect on what people thought about the fairness of the decision when it positively impacted women.

While the presence of women in the committee was more likely to increase the perceived legitimacy of the antifeminist decision for everyone, the effect was twice as strong for men.