FERRAGAMO / CLASSIC CAP-TOE PUMP IN BLACK SUEDE C & PATENT / 6 C / EXCELLENT 7122e3

FERRAGAMO / CLASSIC CAP-TOE PUMP IN BLACK SUEDE  C & PATENT / 6 C  / EXCELLENT 7122e3FERRAGAMO / CLASSIC CAP-TOE PUMP IN BLACK SUEDE  C & PATENT / 6 C  / EXCELLENT 7122e3FERRAGAMO / CLASSIC CAP-TOE PUMP IN BLACK SUEDE  C & PATENT / 6 C  / EXCELLENT 7122e3FERRAGAMO / CLASSIC CAP-TOE PUMP IN BLACK SUEDE  C & PATENT / 6 C  / EXCELLENT 7122e3FERRAGAMO / CLASSIC CAP-TOE PUMP IN BLACK SUEDE  C & PATENT / 6 C  / EXCELLENT 7122e3FERRAGAMO / CLASSIC CAP-TOE PUMP IN BLACK SUEDE  C & PATENT / 6 C  / EXCELLENT 7122e3

Item specifics

Condition: :
An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: EXCELLENT
Brand: SALVATORE FERRAGAMO Material: SUEDE & PATENT / LEATHER
Style: PUMP Heel Height: Med (1 3/4 in. to 2 3/4 in.)
US Shoe Size (Women's): 6 Color: Black
Width: C Country of Manufacture: Italy
UPC: Does not apply

Skip to main content

FERRAGAMO / CLASSIC CAP-TOE PUMP IN BLACK SUEDE C & PATENT / 6 C / EXCELLENT 7122e3

Alegria BY Pg Lite Sophistisnake ALG-723 Snake Pattern Clogs Shoes Womens 38 / 7NEW CROCS WALU BLACK CANVAS SLIP ON LOAFER SHOES WOMENS 7 FREE SHIP,2018 Spring Women's Pumps Shoes Round Toe Low Block Heel Tassel Slip On CasualWomen's Mary Jane Square Toe Flats Brogue Strappy Carved Cute Girl Shoes Oxfords,G.H. Bass Becca Loafer Shoes Sz 7.5 M Suede Slip-on Basket Weave Blue Brown,Minnetonka Womens Kilty Hardsole Moccasin - Cherry (9 US)Munro American Womens US 9M Black Leather Suede Casual Slip-On Work Heels Shoes,Lucky Brand Shoes Sandals Wedge Espadrilles Black Keane Size US 8.5 MWomen Casual Solid Leather Fur Lined Loafers Square Toe Flat Shoes Plus Size,Womens MUNRO 215480 black leather oxfords sz. 6.5 M NEW! $214.95,CLARKS WOMEN'S GLOVE PUPPET CROCODILE EMBOSSED SLIP ON SHOES BLACK SIZE 8.5 NEW,Azura by Spring Step Women's Montse Slip-on LoaferNIB Converse All Star Perf Sneaker Motel Pool/Black/White 551623F Womens Sz 7-10,SPERRY TOP SIDER A/O Silver Metallic Leather Boat Shoe Size 8 NIB $95,NEW Gentle Souls Blue It's So Fun Lizard-embossed Slingback Women Size 6.5, $210,Marc Fisher Womens Shiloh Leather Pointed Toe Slide Flats,Soft Style by Hush Puppies Women's Hillary Ii Red Railroad Stripe Canvas 8 M US,ECCO Womens Bella Tie - Choose SZ/ColorSAS Women's Horse Bit Loafer Style Shoes Sz 7.5 M Silver Moc Toe Leather USA,Be&D Women's Joe Studded Flat Nude Tan Size 39.5 8.5 Silver Spike,Womens Alfani Jayda Black Espadrilles 6 M,Lucky Brand Women's Calandra Ballet Flat - Choose SZ/ColorBritish Womens Loafers Low Block Heels Slip On Leather Square Toes Formal Shoes,NATURALIZER CLARISSA CLOGS WOMEN'S US SIZE 7.5 W LEATHER,Starfish Elegant Summer Flats Ladys Beach Sandals Womens Party Slingback Shoes,Womens Creppers Buckle Leather Flats Loafer Slip On Casual Shoes Board 3 Colors,BCBG MaxAzria Women's perforated suede leather black loafers Size US 7.5B,Impo Tan Leather Loafers Driving Mocs Dela Sz 9.5M Womens Alligator Look,EARTH KALSO WOMAN SHOES CLOGS MULE BROWN SUEDE LEATHER SZ US 7 B EUCLifeStride Women's Zalana Pointed Toe Flat, Black, 8 W US,

by Sep. 21, 2018, 8:37 AM

To conduct their study, the researchers varied the gender composition of a hypothetical bipartisan legislative committee and the decision it made about a policy impacting women’s rights.

The legislative committee was either all male or gender-balanced, and the choice on the docket was either to increase or decrease penalties for workplace sexual harassment. Since the victims of workplace harassment are overwhelmingly female, a decision to increase penalties signified a positive impact for women, while the decision to decrease the penalties would signify a negative impact.

The presence of women legitimizes legislative decisions

For each of the four possible conditions, the survey respondents were asked whether the decision was right for all citizens, whether it was right for women specifically and how fair it was to women.

They found that the public was substantially more likely to perceive a decision negatively impacting women as fair when it was made by a gender balanced committee than when the same decision was made by an all-male committee. The gender composition had no effect on what people thought about the fairness of the decision when it positively impacted women.

While the presence of women in the committee was more likely to increase the perceived legitimacy of the antifeminist decision for everyone, the effect was twice as strong for men.