US4-11 Women Sequin Bee Heart Low Decor Bling Loafers Moccasins Low Heart Heel Shoes b08b28

US4-11 Women Sequin Bee Heart Low Decor Bling Loafers Moccasins Low Heart Heel Shoes b08b28US4-11 Women Sequin Bee Heart Low Decor Bling Loafers Moccasins Low Heart Heel Shoes b08b28US4-11 Women Sequin Bee Heart Low Decor Bling Loafers Moccasins Low Heart Heel Shoes b08b28

Item specifics

Condition:
New without box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) that is not in original packaging or ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: Unbranded
Occasion: Wear to Work Style: Loafers & Moccasins
Pattern: Solid Width: Medium (B, M)
EUR Shoe Size (Women's): EUR 41 Material: Suede
Toe Type: Round Toe Heel Height: Low (3/4 in. to 1 1/2 in.)
Country/Region of Manufacture: China

Skip to main content

US4-11 Women Sequin Bee Heart Low Decor Bling Loafers Moccasins Low Heart Heel Shoes b08b28

Trotters Women's Sizzle Ballet Flat, Burgundy, 8 SS US,Kenneth Cole New York Women's Walden Shine Glitzy Slip Loafer Flat,Kelsi Dagger Brooklyn Women's Avenue Mule, Wheat, 8.5 M US,PRADA RED PATENT LEATHER FLAT SHOES ROUND TOE LARGE FLAT Size 8 38Man's/Woman's NEW LEO STUDIO DESIGN WOMENS ESPADRILLES Excellent craft Online Sales online store,US Shoe Size Women Pointed Toe Ankle Wrap D'Orsay Dress Flats Comfort Casual New,J / Slides AZUL Tassel Beige Suede Faux Fur Slip Sneaker Mules Flats 8 ANTHRO *,Men's/Women's Pure Navy Norita Suede Loafer Exquisite (middle) workmanship New in stock Various,PRADA PATENT LEATHER CLASSICS PUMP HEELS SIZE 381/2 MADE IN ITALYKlogs Zest Womens Lightweight Slip-resistant Clogs Black - 11 Medium,Munro American Brand New Crocodile Penny Loafers Shoes Womens Size 7.5 SS,Paul Green Brown Suede Horsebit Moc Toe Casual Loafer Shoe Womens 7.5 UK / US 10,Women's Steve Madden Viienna 3 inch Leather Heels BlackSize 8.5 M (GKB12Earthies Womens Black Size 6 B Milos Leather Slingback Peep Toe Die Cut Wedges,Womens 8 M Hush Puppies Valoia Oleena Dark Brown Leather Comfort Dress Shoes,Icon Women's Beige Leather 'Kellogg's Corn Flakes' Slip-On Loafers Size 5.5 M,$225 Stuart Weitzman Chitchat Peep Toe Toe Buckle Ballet Flats 7.5 in Quasar RedEasy Spirit Travelport 17 Navy M Suede Womens Clogs Size 8.5M,Sperry Top-Sider Bahama White Iridescent Sequin Shoes Women Size 10M Boat ShoesNWOB Micheal Kors Black Leather Flats Slipon Ballet Reva Shoes Size 8.5-Beautifu,TINO LANZI Womens Italian Leather Black Red Oxford Shoes Size 37.5,Nike Womens Court Tradition 2 (315161). New In Box Without Tags,Women's Think! 36 Black Suede Slipon Shoes 5 M A063,Bella Marie Angie-106 Women's Pointy Toe Boat Slip on Patent Band Decor Paten...Clarks Women’s Artisan Black Leather Mules 9M Sr1GDEFY Gravity Defyer Womens Size 8 Black Leather Slip On Mules ShoesSkechers 00_105846_FK Womens Relaxed Fit Granola Nature Role Slide,Women winter suede leather fur ball boat shoe thicken warm pull on flat loafers,ADRIENNE VITTADINI Footwear Women's Aronni Mary Jane Flat, Blue, 8 M US,Yuu Valance Womens Slip-On Shoes Black Size 11W,

by Sep. 21, 2018, 8:37 AM

To conduct their study, the researchers varied the gender composition of a hypothetical bipartisan legislative committee and the decision it made about a policy impacting women’s rights.

The legislative committee was either all male or gender-balanced, and the choice on the docket was either to increase or decrease penalties for workplace sexual harassment. Since the victims of workplace harassment are overwhelmingly female, a decision to increase penalties signified a positive impact for women, while the decision to decrease the penalties would signify a negative impact.

The presence of women legitimizes legislative decisions

For each of the four possible conditions, the survey respondents were asked whether the decision was right for all citizens, whether it was right for women specifically and how fair it was to women.

They found that the public was substantially more likely to perceive a decision negatively impacting women as fair when it was made by a gender balanced committee than when the same decision was made by an all-male committee. The gender composition had no effect on what people thought about the fairness of the decision when it positively impacted women.

While the presence of women in the committee was more likely to increase the perceived legitimacy of the antifeminist decision for everyone, the effect was twice as strong for men.