New Sperry STS82279 7 Seas Sport Grey / Burgundy US Women's Casual Shoes 8.5 US Burgundy 01fd4d

New Sperry STS82279 7 Seas Sport Grey / Burgundy US Women's Casual Shoes 8.5 US Burgundy 01fd4dNew Sperry STS82279 7 Seas Sport Grey / Burgundy US Women's Casual Shoes 8.5 US Burgundy 01fd4dNew Sperry STS82279 7 Seas Sport Grey / Burgundy US Women's Casual Shoes 8.5 US Burgundy 01fd4dNew Sperry STS82279 7 Seas Sport Grey / Burgundy US Women's Casual Shoes 8.5 US Burgundy 01fd4dNew Sperry STS82279 7 Seas Sport Grey / Burgundy US Women's Casual Shoes 8.5 US Burgundy 01fd4d

Item specifics

Condition:
New with box: A brand-new, unused, and unworn item (including handmade items) in the original packaging (such as ... Read moreabout the condition
Brand: Sperry
Width: Medium (B, M) Style: Oxfords
Color: Gray US Shoe Size (Women's): US 8.5
UPC: 884547905109

Skip to main content

New Sperry STS82279 7 Seas Sport Grey / Burgundy US Women's Casual Shoes 8.5 US Burgundy 01fd4d

Marc Fisher Womens Sunny4 Leather Pointed Toe Slide Flats,Klogs Professional Women Clogs Black Smooth - 11 WideBlack Leather DANSKO Clogs "Professional" Size US 6.5 - 7,Patrizia by Spring Step Women's Ravi Black shoes size US 5.5-10,Judith Ripka Black Suede Buckle Detail Sally Ballet Flats 8 NEW,Mr/Ms Aldo Women's Starda Flat Sandal Customer first discount price Seasonal hot sale,CLARKS GENETTE VISTA WOMEN'S US SIZE 9 M LEATHER CUSHIONED,Dansko Women's SONJA BOX, OPEN Back Clogs Black Leather SZ 4.5-5.0 M NEW D7657,NEW CHACO GALA SLIP ON LOAFERS SHOES WOMENS 7 RUM RAISIN FREE SHIP,Women's Pointed Toe Real Leather Slip On Chic Mules Flat Heels casual Shoes Size,Dansko Elin Tan Suede Mules Clogs Womens Size 6.5 - 7/ EU37,Skechers Womens Reggae Fest Willows Flat- Pick SZ/Color.,Steve Madden Addan Oxford, Women's US 10, Pewter,NEW Cole Haan Womens 10.5M White Leather Driving Moccasins,Womens Slip on Loafers Shoes Soft Soled Ethnic Trend Round Toe Pumps Flats ShoesWomens Fashion Leather Leisure Flats Heels Round Toe Pull On Casual Work shoes,Mephisto Womens Moc Toe Low Heel Loafers Black Suede Sz 6.5,Men's/Women's Rockport Women's Cobb Hill Adele High grade comfortability Popular recommendation,SUMMIT BY WHITE MOUNTIAN ELISE black glitter pointy toe flats sz. 41 $110,ADRIENNE VITTADINI Footwear Women's Aronni Mary Jane Flat, Blue, 8 M US,Sperry Top-Sider Women's Coil Ivy Linen Scale Emboss Boat Shoes STS80256 NIB,Large Size Hollow Out Pure Color Soft Casual Flats Women Shoes,DREW Womens Orthopedic Diabetic Shoes Size 8N Narrow DAISY Grey Marble Toggle,Exotic BELLE SIGERSON MORRISON Striped Animal Pattern T-Strap Sandal Flats 8.5Men/Women Teva Women's Hydro-Life Slip-On Year-end special promotions Ranked first in its class Elegant and solemnSkechers Women's Relaxed Fit Bikers Pedestrian Slip-onLadies Clarks Cloud Steppers Shoes - Sillian Tino,Gentleman/Lady Franco Sarto Palmer Snakeskin Mule 7.5 Quality queen a wide range of products Cost-effective,Earthies Tolo Women's Casual Flats Navy Blue Size 8 Ballet Leather,Isaac Mizrahi Janice Gold Leather Floral Balllet Flats 9 New,

by Sep. 21, 2018, 8:37 AM

To conduct their study, the researchers varied the gender composition of a hypothetical bipartisan legislative committee and the decision it made about a policy impacting women’s rights.

The legislative committee was either all male or gender-balanced, and the choice on the docket was either to increase or decrease penalties for workplace sexual harassment. Since the victims of workplace harassment are overwhelmingly female, a decision to increase penalties signified a positive impact for women, while the decision to decrease the penalties would signify a negative impact.

The presence of women legitimizes legislative decisions

For each of the four possible conditions, the survey respondents were asked whether the decision was right for all citizens, whether it was right for women specifically and how fair it was to women.

They found that the public was substantially more likely to perceive a decision negatively impacting women as fair when it was made by a gender balanced committee than when the same decision was made by an all-male committee. The gender composition had no effect on what people thought about the fairness of the decision when it positively impacted women.

While the presence of women in the committee was more likely to increase the perceived legitimacy of the antifeminist decision for everyone, the effect was twice as strong for men.