Converse All Star Joker 9 black hi sneakers 7 mens 9 Joker womens a96587

Converse All Star Joker 9 black hi sneakers 7 mens 9 Joker womens a96587Converse All Star Joker 9 black hi sneakers 7 mens 9 Joker womens a96587Converse All Star Joker 9 black hi sneakers 7 mens 9 Joker womens a96587Converse All Star Joker 9 black hi sneakers 7 mens 9 Joker womens a96587Converse All Star Joker 9 black hi sneakers 7 mens 9 Joker womens a96587Converse All Star Joker 9 black hi sneakers 7 mens 9 Joker womens a96587

Item specifics

Condition: :
An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: very good pre owned
Brand: Converse Color: black
Style: Athletic Sneakers Euro Size: 40
US Shoe Size (Men's): 7 Pattern: Joker
Width: Medium (D, M) Modified Item: No
Material: synthetic womens size: 9
UPC: Does Not Apply

Skip to main content

Converse All Star Joker 9 black hi sneakers 7 mens 9 Joker womens a96587

Nike Fly.By Low Men's Black White Sneakers Shoes 908973 001 Size 9.5 MVOLCOM LO FI SCULL FLOWER SNEAKERS 6 FR 38,Saucony Excursion TR12 GTX Running Shoes, Blk/Slvr/Grn, Mens US 11.5,ASICS Gel-Contend 3 Men's Running Shoes US 11.5 (4E),Vans Authentic Brown/Multi Paisley Skateboard Shoes - Men's Size 13P S G MENS SHOES SIZE 13 GREEN AND WHITEMan's/Woman's Shoes Harley Davidson Size 6.5 Quality queen Year-end sale Good quality,Air Jordan Future Grey/Volt Reflective 3M Sneakers US 13,Mens Jordan Flight Luminary Silver 551820-007 Jumpman Nike Basketball Size 10.5,NEW PUMA Suede Classic Olympian Blue White + Sneaker US Size 9.5 Shoes for MEN,Men's Mountains Summer Breathable Shoes Mesh Y3 Outdoor Hiking Casual Large SizeRYCORE ZERO 4 BLUE LIME BASKETBALL SHOES MEN'S SIZE 8.5-13 FREE SHIPPING!!,Nike Black Leather Sneakers 304587 001 Mens Size 13,adidas PULSADO ST MCDO "McDonald's" 445616 ruby/mtgold/wht Size 10,Saucony S70217-5 Grid SD Grey/Purple Athletic Running Sneaker Men's US 11,Adidas Campus Sneaker - Men's Size 11 Black/White,adidas yeezy 350 v2 Lot Like Retro Lebron Kobe Kd Kyrie 1 Foam Fresh 5s,New NIKE Zoom Distance Track Running Spikes Shoes Men 11.5 Grey Black 819164-010,Asics Men's Hyper MD 6 Track Running Shoes Sz. 10.5 NEW G502Y 0743,Reebok Twistform Blaze 2.0 MTM AR2960 Black White Mesh Running Shoes Medium Men,VANS New Authentic Canvas Vault Size USA 9PERRY ELLIS America Mel Athlletic Shoes Men's 10 1/2,Converse, Size 12, great condition, worn one time,adidas Mens Sz 7.5 Athletic Running Walking Sneakers Shoes Gray Blue G,NEW Converse Chuck Taylor II Low Skateboard Shoes 150151C Men's Sizes Salsa RedASICS GT-1000 Black -Silver -Gray -White- Maroon T5A2N Running Shoes Men Sz 11,Nike SB Solarsoft Portmore II Canvas Shoes - Men's Size 11 - Black/White DAMAGED,Vans Leather Suede Brown/Brown Mens Us SIze 9.5 SC8,Denver Hayes Hamilton Men Black Slip-On Shoes 8.5M,Brand New adidas Men's Response LT M Running Shoes Sz 7

by Sep. 21, 2018, 8:37 AM

To conduct their study, the researchers varied the gender composition of a hypothetical bipartisan legislative committee and the decision it made about a policy impacting women’s rights.

The legislative committee was either all male or gender-balanced, and the choice on the docket was either to increase or decrease penalties for workplace sexual harassment. Since the victims of workplace harassment are overwhelmingly female, a decision to increase penalties signified a positive impact for women, while the decision to decrease the penalties would signify a negative impact.

The presence of women legitimizes legislative decisions

For each of the four possible conditions, the survey respondents were asked whether the decision was right for all citizens, whether it was right for women specifically and how fair it was to women.

They found that the public was substantially more likely to perceive a decision negatively impacting women as fair when it was made by a gender balanced committee than when the same decision was made by an all-male committee. The gender composition had no effect on what people thought about the fairness of the decision when it positively impacted women.

While the presence of women in the committee was more likely to increase the perceived legitimacy of the antifeminist decision for everyone, the effect was twice as strong for men.