USED Men's NORTHSIDE SNOHOMISH Hiking Low Brown+Red Waterproof Trail Hiking SNOHOMISH Shoes 089a3e

USED Men's NORTHSIDE SNOHOMISH Hiking Low Brown+Red Waterproof Trail Hiking SNOHOMISH Shoes 089a3e

Item specifics

Condition: :
An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: These shoes are lightly . There is minor wear and soiling on the soles. Uppers are in good condition with lightly soiled places here and there. Insoles are in good condition. SIZE 10 right shoe has top fabric eyelet tab on the left side pulled out--will have to skip that pair or have another one sewn in.. Size 9.5 pair soles are dirty with minor wear. Insoles have imprints. Uppers are .
Material: Leather Features: Water Resistant
Modified Item: Yes Shoe Height: Low Top
Style: Hiking Shoes Upper Material: Leather
Sub Style: Trail Running Color: Brown
Width: Medium (D, M) Modification Description: Shoes are .
Pattern: Geometric Brand: Northside
Year: 2016

Skip to main content

USED Men's NORTHSIDE SNOHOMISH Hiking Low Brown+Red Waterproof Trail Hiking SNOHOMISH Shoes 089a3e

VANS SHOES MENS SIZE US12 OFF THE WALL GRAPHIC BLACK SKATER SHOES,Mens Side Zip Casual Athletic Sneakers Hidden Heels Loafers Shoes Sports Fashion,New Summer Men's Breathable Athletic Sneakers Casual Canvas Running Shoe S Sbox1Men Black Blade Athletic Running Shoes Big Size Shock-proof Casual Walking Shoes,Apex Double Strap Men's Black Casual Shoe Preowned,NEW MEN SHOES TRENDY BATTLEFIELD UNISEX SHOES INDESTRUCTIBLE BOOTS whb98,Men's Air Wair with Bouncing Isole, High Top Sneaker Size 8 , Black,Men's/Women's adidas Locator - Black - Mens bargain Orders are welcome At an affordable price,Saucony Men’s SHOWDOWN Sprinter Racing Spike Track Shoes size 9.5,New Balance HK NB 420 x Women Size 8.5 PinkNike Mens - Gray Running Shoes Size 12 (352926),Men 's Outdoor sports Breathable Casual Sneakers City Running Fashion Shoes,Man's/Woman's Puma TX-300 Men's Size 10 durability Orders are welcome Excellent function,NWT MEN'S VANS WARD 3 (MONO SURPLUS) SNEAKERS/SHOES SIZE 9.BRAND NEW FOR 2018!,Men's Running Shoes Sneakers Mesh Light Weight Sports Outdoor Comfort Shoes New,Nike Zoom Superfly Elite Racing Track Spikes Blue Black White SZ ( 835996-413 ),Rockport Mens Walking Shoes Size 7 (35396),new mens 10 under armour banshee mid MC molded lacrosse cleats 1250088-wht/navy,Merrell Mens J23485 Cafe Fashion Sneaker Size 8 (6630),2017 Fashion Men's Running Breathable Sports Casual Athletic Sneakers Shoes,Women's Spring Leather White Shoes Korean Casual Breathable Students Shoes Y607,O'neill Women's Sandals "Capitola" -- Color BlackAdidas Veritas X S77632 Men's Basketball Shoes Burgundy White Men Size 9.5 USDiadora NJ-303 Trama 2 - Blue - Mens,Converse Unisex Chuck Taylor The Joker High Top Sneakers size 10 Men WO 12Gentleman/Lady Reebok DMX Shoes Size 9 US Various styles buy Most practical,NEW Mens Warrior Adonis 99 LAX Cleats Rabil Edition White/Blue/Red - Choose SizeAdidas Questar Ride Athletic Shoes - Men's Size 11 - Black/White/Carbon,Adidas Tobacco Shoes Vintage Brown Suede Made in Indonesia Rare Men’s Sz US 10,Draven Rick Thorne Microphone Soldier Mens Size 10 Suede Skateboard Shoes,

by Sep. 21, 2018, 8:37 AM

To conduct their study, the researchers varied the gender composition of a hypothetical bipartisan legislative committee and the decision it made about a policy impacting women’s rights.

The legislative committee was either all male or gender-balanced, and the choice on the docket was either to increase or decrease penalties for workplace sexual harassment. Since the victims of workplace harassment are overwhelmingly female, a decision to increase penalties signified a positive impact for women, while the decision to decrease the penalties would signify a negative impact.

The presence of women legitimizes legislative decisions

For each of the four possible conditions, the survey respondents were asked whether the decision was right for all citizens, whether it was right for women specifically and how fair it was to women.

They found that the public was substantially more likely to perceive a decision negatively impacting women as fair when it was made by a gender balanced committee than when the same decision was made by an all-male committee. The gender composition had no effect on what people thought about the fairness of the decision when it positively impacted women.

While the presence of women in the committee was more likely to increase the perceived legitimacy of the antifeminist decision for everyone, the effect was twice as strong for men.