Nike Shox Gravity USA Royal Olympic AR1999 406 Game Royal USA University Red size 8.5 NEW 03276f

Nike Shox Gravity USA Royal Olympic AR1999 406 Game Royal USA University Red size 8.5 NEW 03276f

Item specifics

Condition: New without box :
A brand-new, un, and un item (including handmade items) that is not in original packaging or may be missing original packaging materials (such as the original box or bag). The original tags may not be attached. For example, new shoes (with absolutely no signs of wear) that are no longer in their original box fall into this category. See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: brand new, box missing lid!
Style: Athletic Sneakers Brand:


US Shoe Size (Men's): 8.5 UPC:

Does not apply

Skip to main content

Nike Shox Gravity USA Royal Olympic AR1999 406 Game Royal USA University Red size 8.5 NEW 03276f

Nike Air Presto Fly Men's Sneaker Black Size Eur 40 S25NIKE ROSHE TWO FLYKNIT Running Trainers Gym Casual Black Orange - Various Sizes,Nike Free Run 2 Men's Shoes Size 8Nike Air Max 90 Ultra BR Men's Size 13 Running Shoes Pure Platinum 725222 012,Nike Roshe One HYP BR Mens Trainers 833125 800 Sneakers Shoes,Nike SB Zoom Dunk High Elite Size 12 Red White Navy 917567-641 Mens Skate Shoes,MENS ORIGINAL NIKE KWAZI WHITE BLACK TRAINERS,Nike LeBron XI (11) Dunkman sz 8.5,Nike Kyrie 4 Chinese New Year “YOTM”,Jordan Fly Unlimited Men's Basketball Shoes Sneakers AA1282-011 USA Men's Sz 9.5Air Jordan 1 Mid RE2PECT -SIZE 8.5 AH6342-402 Respect Navy White Derek Jeter GumNew Nike Zoom All Out Flyknit OC Olympic Collection Mens Size 14 | 845716-999,Nike Air Zoom Vomero 11 Mens Running Training Blue Orange White 818099 401 NIBNike Kobe XI 11 EM Carpe Diem Sz 9 Elite Lakers,adidas Women's Alphabounce 1 W - Choose SZ/Color,Nike Air Max brand new without box. Genuine from UK high street shop. Size-10Mens Nike Jordan Formula 23 Navy/White Trainers 881465-405 UK Size:6.5_7 (26),NEW Adidas Women’s Climacross BOOST Golf Shoes PINK WHITE Q44933 Size 8,Nike Mens Size 6 Shox Avenue Running Training Shoes White Silver 833583-101 MenNike Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG "VINTAGE CORAL" Sail Logo Pack Swoosh 555088-800NIKE Air Jordan 13 Retro “Black Cat” Style Size 9 VGUC,Nike Air Jordan 1 Mid Retro Shoes Trainers SizeNIKE ZOOM SPEED TRAIL LE COOL GREY SIZE 10.0 RUNNING NEW AUTHENTIC!,NIKE AIR FORCE 1 ’07 SZ 10.5 WOLF GREY WHITE AA4083 010NIKE KOBE XI ELITE BASKETBALL MEN'S SHOES BRAND NEW SIZE (EC5),Nike Men’s LeBron XIII Elite Limited Squadron Blue 864942-440 Size 8.5,nike zoom flight turbine white/silver 2002 RareNike Air Stab 2006 Red Cement JPACK Retro QS LE SZ 12 JORDAN AJ3 VTG ACG FREESH,Nike Shox Avenue Mens Running White/Silver-Black Nike (833583-101) Size 9,Nike Court Borough Mid Black/White 838938-010 Men's SZ 10,

by Sep. 21, 2018, 8:37 AM

To conduct their study, the researchers varied the gender composition of a hypothetical bipartisan legislative committee and the decision it made about a policy impacting women’s rights.

The legislative committee was either all male or gender-balanced, and the choice on the docket was either to increase or decrease penalties for workplace sexual harassment. Since the victims of workplace harassment are overwhelmingly female, a decision to increase penalties signified a positive impact for women, while the decision to decrease the penalties would signify a negative impact.

The presence of women legitimizes legislative decisions

For each of the four possible conditions, the survey respondents were asked whether the decision was right for all citizens, whether it was right for women specifically and how fair it was to women.

They found that the public was substantially more likely to perceive a decision negatively impacting women as fair when it was made by a gender balanced committee than when the same decision was made by an all-male committee. The gender composition had no effect on what people thought about the fairness of the decision when it positively impacted women.

While the presence of women in the committee was more likely to increase the perceived legitimacy of the antifeminist decision for everyone, the effect was twice as strong for men.