TOD'S Embossed Mauve Leather Mauve Embossed Loafers Size 37 2cb809

TOD'S Embossed Mauve Leather  Mauve Embossed Loafers Size 37 2cb809TOD'S Embossed Mauve Leather  Mauve Embossed Loafers Size 37 2cb809TOD'S Embossed Mauve Leather  Mauve Embossed Loafers Size 37 2cb809TOD'S Embossed Mauve Leather  Mauve Embossed Loafers Size 37 2cb809TOD'S Embossed Mauve Leather  Mauve Embossed Loafers Size 37 2cb809TOD'S Embossed Mauve Leather  Mauve Embossed Loafers Size 37 2cb809

Item specifics

Condition:
: An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and ... Read moreabout the condition
Color: Mauve
US Shoe Size (Women's): 37 Material: Leather
Width: Medium (B, M) Brand: Tod's
Heel Height: Flat (0 to 1/2 in.) Style: Loafers
Heel Type: Block UPC: Does not apply

Skip to main content

TOD'S Embossed Mauve Leather Mauve Embossed Loafers Size 37 2cb809

Aravon Women's Bonnie-AR Slip-On Loafer,Black,8.5 2A US,Vince Levins Leather Flat Mules, Size 9.5,NEW SCHOLL ORTHAHEEL COOMA WOMENS COMFORTABLE SHOES WITH ADJUSTABLE STRAP,Clarks Women's Gracelin Art Mary Jane Flat,J.CREW PLAID ANKLE STRAP D'ORDAY FLAT SIZE 10.5M RED BLACK H1841,Munro Women's Lilac Jerrie Flat 5498 Size 7N,Ladies Sweet Loafer Flat Leather Stars Slip ON Casual Stylish Round Toe Shoes sz,Tod's NIB No Code Pewter Iridescent Loafers Flats Size 10 40 B Retail $595,Ahnu Gracie Pro Nubuck Slip On Shoes, Women's - Size 9, BrownWomen's Sweet Flat Leather Stars Slip ON Casual Stylish Round Toe Shoes Chic Y56Avec Les Filles Georgie Espadrille Gladiator Flats 488, Avec Pink, 8 USMen's/Women's Fendi Size 6/36 Blue Leather Flats Crazy price, Birmingham First quality negotiation,ECCO Women's Women's Bluma Toggle Gladiator SandalAuthentic Burberry Pony Hair Loafer Flat Espadrille Size 38/8,VINCE CAMUTO SNEAKERS FLOWER EMBELLISHED/GLOSSY BLACK LEATHER SIZE 7 SUPER CUTE!,Women Casual Flats Heel Round Toe Rivet Slip On Sneakers Creeper SHoes Fur WarmGentleman/Lady N21 Flat Bow Mules Reputation first At a lower price Fine wild,NIB Tory Burch LOUISA Logo Flat Natural / Fango Snake Embossed Leather Shoe Sz 6,Dansko Women's Olivia Loafer - Choose SZ/Color,SoftWalk Womens Hadley Leather Closed Toe Mary Jane FlatsVANELi Womens FC-313 Leather Closed Toe Classic Pumps Navy Size 9.0,Calvin Klein Ambra Black Womens Shoes Size 6 M Flats MSRP $129Stylish Vogue Womens Pointy Toe Casual Stripes Loafers Splicing Moccasins Shoes,Burberry Deardown Black Oxford women's size 9.5 m Euro 39.5 retail 1095.00,women pointy toe block heels leather European celebrity shoes metallic OL shoes,Gentlemen/Ladies Walking Cradles Womens bounce Closed Toe Various styles Online Diversified new designEastland Men's Solstice Boat Shoe, Tan, Size 9.5,Womens FRYE ivory / silver crackled leather ballet flats sz. 9.5 M,Women Flats Oxfords Faux Leather Mules Shoes Slides Ankle Boots Sandal Size 4-8,$225+ NEW Tory Burch Sz 10.5 CAROLINE Elastic Trim Ballet Flats Shoes Navy Red,

by Sep. 21, 2018, 8:37 AM

To conduct their study, the researchers varied the gender composition of a hypothetical bipartisan legislative committee and the decision it made about a policy impacting women’s rights.

The legislative committee was either all male or gender-balanced, and the choice on the docket was either to increase or decrease penalties for workplace sexual harassment. Since the victims of workplace harassment are overwhelmingly female, a decision to increase penalties signified a positive impact for women, while the decision to decrease the penalties would signify a negative impact.

The presence of women legitimizes legislative decisions

For each of the four possible conditions, the survey respondents were asked whether the decision was right for all citizens, whether it was right for women specifically and how fair it was to women.

They found that the public was substantially more likely to perceive a decision negatively impacting women as fair when it was made by a gender balanced committee than when the same decision was made by an all-male committee. The gender composition had no effect on what people thought about the fairness of the decision when it positively impacted women.

While the presence of women in the committee was more likely to increase the perceived legitimacy of the antifeminist decision for everyone, the effect was twice as strong for men.