Saint Shoes Laurent Paris Men's Shoes Saint 329126 OrangexMulticolor 42 1/2 51e4c4

Saint Shoes Laurent Paris Men's Shoes Saint 329126 OrangexMulticolor 42 1/2 51e4c4Saint Shoes Laurent Paris Men's Shoes Saint 329126 OrangexMulticolor 42 1/2 51e4c4Saint Shoes Laurent Paris Men's Shoes Saint 329126 OrangexMulticolor 42 1/2 51e4c4Saint Shoes Laurent Paris Men's Shoes Saint 329126 OrangexMulticolor 42 1/2 51e4c4Saint Shoes Laurent Paris Men's Shoes Saint 329126 OrangexMulticolor 42 1/2 51e4c4Saint Shoes Laurent Paris Men's Shoes Saint 329126 OrangexMulticolor 42 1/2 51e4c4

Item specifics

Condition: :
An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: Item which there is little feeling of wearing, and is not worried about a dirt and damage
Brand: Unbranded Style: Not Specified
US Shoe Size (Men's): 9.5 Color: Orange
UPC: Does not apply

Skip to main content

Saint Shoes Laurent Paris Men's Shoes Saint 329126 OrangexMulticolor 42 1/2 51e4c4

Tommy Hilfiger Mens Danny Slip-On Loafer- Pick SZ/Color.,Nike Air Vapormax Inneva Men's - Size 10.5 - Summit White,TOMMY BAHAMA 53 Brandy w/ Espresso Brown Leather Slip On Loafers Sz 8.5,9 M Teva men's Original Open Toe Strap SandalGentlemen/Ladies Hermes Sneakers 42.5 9.5 Orange Men High grade a wide range of products Fashion versatile shoes,Peter Werth Mens Tan Caine Ankle Boot Suede Oxford Shoes,Vans Chukka 49 LX Jungle Style Men's US Size 9/Women's US Size 10.5,Converse All Star Chuck '70 Ox in Parchment BNIB Sz 3-12,Mr/Ms Globe Winslow SG - RRP 99.99 Clever and practical Low price Characteristics,Masion Margiela 22 Future Low Leather ZIP Sneaker (8 US/41 EU, Black) Reg $725,Khombu Size 9 Brown River Sandals Men ShoesPUMA Men's Clyde MJRL FM Dazzling Blue/Dazzling Blue 8 D USThe Realm Black/Gray Flip Flop Sandals (Mens US 11) [GR] 036840645,Ethnic Handmade Designer D Tan Color Synthetic Leather Jalsa Jutti For Men,Brand New Men's Lightweight Canvas Flip Flops Sandals Available in 3 Colors,Amoji Unisex Garden Clogs Shoes Sandals Slippers Black,lizard men shoes, Barcelino Linea Italia, loafer,9M, Awesome,On SALE SAVE $240.,Knapp Black Leather All Purpose Men's Casual Chukka Boots Sz 9.5 E NWOB USA100% AUTH NEW MEN CHRISTIAN LOUBOUTIN DIRK EMBOSSED KNOT LOAFERS /US 9,Mens GBX Olive Taupe Suede Leather Comfortable Slip On Boat Loafer Medium Shoe,Deckers dba Ahnu Mens Steiner Perforated Sneaker- Pick SZ/Color.,VT1054 - Vass Austerity Brogue - Bordeaux Calf - US 7 - S Last,NEW VOLCOM MEN SPILLS SANDALS FLIP FLOP CREEDLERS BLACK RED US size 9Nunn Bush mens sandals Riptide size 11 NEW,Puma Mens Leadcat Blue Pool Slip On Slide Sandals Sandals 9 Medium (D) BHFO 7229,MENS EVERLAST ULTIMATE PRO BOXING BOOTS CASUAL GYM BLACK SNEAKERS MEN'S SHOES03-187 Florsheim Men's Getaway Fisherman Brown SIZE 12MNEW MENS ZASEL COFFEE FORMAL CASUAL DRESS WORK LEATHER FORMAL EVERYDAY SHOES,HAVAIANAS NEW MENS THONGS FLIP FLOPS TOP MIX BLACK STEEL GREY WHITE Surf Logo,COLE HAAN MEN'S "HOWLAND" PENNY LOAFER BLACK TUMBLED LEATHER US SZ 7.5 MEDIUM

by Sep. 21, 2018, 8:37 AM

To conduct their study, the researchers varied the gender composition of a hypothetical bipartisan legislative committee and the decision it made about a policy impacting women’s rights.

The legislative committee was either all male or gender-balanced, and the choice on the docket was either to increase or decrease penalties for workplace sexual harassment. Since the victims of workplace harassment are overwhelmingly female, a decision to increase penalties signified a positive impact for women, while the decision to decrease the penalties would signify a negative impact.

The presence of women legitimizes legislative decisions

For each of the four possible conditions, the survey respondents were asked whether the decision was right for all citizens, whether it was right for women specifically and how fair it was to women.

They found that the public was substantially more likely to perceive a decision negatively impacting women as fair when it was made by a gender balanced committee than when the same decision was made by an all-male committee. The gender composition had no effect on what people thought about the fairness of the decision when it positively impacted women.

While the presence of women in the committee was more likely to increase the perceived legitimacy of the antifeminist decision for everyone, the effect was twice as strong for men.