Keen Men's Newport Sandals - - Bison - Sandals 9.5 3e019a

Keen Men's Newport Sandals - - Bison - Sandals 9.5 3e019aKeen Men's Newport Sandals - - Bison - Sandals 9.5 3e019aKeen Men's Newport Sandals - - Bison - Sandals 9.5 3e019aKeen Men's Newport Sandals - - Bison - Sandals 9.5 3e019aKeen Men's Newport Sandals - - Bison - Sandals 9.5 3e019aKeen Men's Newport Sandals - - Bison - Sandals 9.5 3e019aKeen Men's Newport Sandals - - Bison - Sandals 9.5 3e019aKeen Men's Newport Sandals - - Bison - Sandals 9.5 3e019aKeen Men's Newport Sandals - - Bison - Sandals 9.5 3e019a

Item specifics

Condition: :
An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: Good Preowned Condition
Size: 9.5 Color: Bison
Style: Sport Sandals Brand: Keen
US Shoe Size (Men's): 9.5

Skip to main content

Keen Men's Newport Sandals - - Bison - Sandals 9.5 3e019a

Alden Michigan Suede Boots 3563H 011601 Kt1391 Not (22000,S-2116199 New Saint Laurent Camo Fringe HiTop Sneaker Shoe Sz US 8.5 marked 41.5Adidas Stan Smith - Pk S80067 Casual Shoes Blue Medium (D,M) Men,NEW TOM FORD LUXURY CURRENT WARWICK BLACK LEATHER LOGO SNEAKERS SHOES 7.5/US 8.5,BOTTEGA VENETA Intrecciato sneakers leather suede black whiteAdidas Originals x Alexander Wang Bball Soccer Sneakers EU42, UK8, US8 1/2,Vince. Men's Pollock Suede Leather Loafers GG8 Graphite Size 11M $395,DR. MARTENS AIRWAIR BLACK LEATHER OXFORDS MEN'S (11M) EUC THE ORIGINAL CUSHIONSummer Men Sandals Hook&loop Men's Summer Shoes 2018 Fashion Waterproof Casual,Ethnic Handmade Designer Brown Color Synthetic Leather Jalsa Juti For Men,KEEN Utility Men's Flint Low ESD M Steel Toe Work Boot Gargoyle/Forest Night ...,* LORO PIANA * Brown Suede Roadster Model Driving Walking Loafers US 8.5,NIB $110 CONVERSE CTAS Modern Hi Black/White/White 157200C US Mens 10,OluKai Kupono Shoe - Men's Ash 13,New DVA Genji Cartoon Flip Flops Thongs Women Men Sandals Couples Beach Slippers,69 Slam Unisex Sumo Thongs - Size 39 - Sandals FlipflopsTwisted x MDM0003 Driving Moccasins -Men's Size 11M Brown,Base London Butler Washed Tan Leather Mens Brogues Formal Shoes,Adidas Sports Mens Sliders Flip Flop Sandals Supercloud Black White G19102 D77NEW Converse CTAS Alpha Hi Mens Size 10 Aged Gold White Shoes Sneakers 153110C,Dunham Men's Douglas Black 9.5 4E US,John Lobb Dress Shoes Size7.5Eblk Cowhide Misty Courchevel Box (55808,Georgia Mens Soggy Brown Leather Waterproof High Romeo Work Boot GR500Rick Owens Leather Side Zip Boots 000,864 Copper (79017,Emporio Armani Sneaker Sz. 44 LEATHER Man Black X4C472XL205-A013 MAKE OFFER,Men's Beach Sandals Slipper Shoes Bath Shower Slipper Large Size Flip Flops New,Diesel D Klosure Buckled Leather Boots Y01406 P1118 T7434 Olive Men Limited,Men's/Women's Royal Blue Suede Driving Mocassins main category Sales Italy Various latest designsSteve Madden Mens Mastic White Slide Sport Sandals Shoes 10 Medium (D) BHFO 9370,SATORISAN Soumei Napa Leather Black Slip On Loafer Shoe Men 8.5

by Sep. 21, 2018, 8:37 AM

To conduct their study, the researchers varied the gender composition of a hypothetical bipartisan legislative committee and the decision it made about a policy impacting women’s rights.

The legislative committee was either all male or gender-balanced, and the choice on the docket was either to increase or decrease penalties for workplace sexual harassment. Since the victims of workplace harassment are overwhelmingly female, a decision to increase penalties signified a positive impact for women, while the decision to decrease the penalties would signify a negative impact.

The presence of women legitimizes legislative decisions

For each of the four possible conditions, the survey respondents were asked whether the decision was right for all citizens, whether it was right for women specifically and how fair it was to women.

They found that the public was substantially more likely to perceive a decision negatively impacting women as fair when it was made by a gender balanced committee than when the same decision was made by an all-male committee. The gender composition had no effect on what people thought about the fairness of the decision when it positively impacted women.

While the presence of women in the committee was more likely to increase the perceived legitimacy of the antifeminist decision for everyone, the effect was twice as strong for men.