Naturalizer Women's 9.5 Blue Slingback Slip On Shoe Size 9.5 Women's W / 149999 20ce17

Naturalizer Women's 9.5 Blue  Slingback Slip On Shoe Size 9.5 Women's W / 149999 20ce17

Item specifics

Condition: :
An item that has been or previously. See the seller’s listing for full details and description of any imperfections.See all condition definitions- opens in a new window or tab
Seller Notes: -No rips no holes no stains ( Good condition)
Country/Region of Manufacture: China Width: W)
Style: Comfort Pattern: Solid
Fastening: Slip On Color: Blue
Look: Slingbacks Occasion: Casual
US Shoe Size (Women's): 9.5 Brand: Naturalizer
Heel Height: Low (3/4 in. to 1 1/2 in.) Toe Type: Round Toe
Material: Man Made Heel Type: Block
UPC: Does not apply

Skip to main content

Naturalizer Women's 9.5 Blue Slingback Slip On Shoe Size 9.5 Women's W / 149999 20ce17

Man/Woman adidas Neo Sunlina Jqd Elegant appearance Clearance Amoy,Merrell Orbit Womens Gray Moc Gunsmoke Outdoor Loafers Shoes Size 8.5,Womens Fashion Suede Leather Wool Lined Winter Slip On Court Shoes Loafers Sea19,GOLD-TAUPE LEATHER FLATS/WALKING SHOES 7M VERY COMFORTABLE AND PRETTY,Steve Madden Audriana Women Shoes Black Leather D'orsay Flats Sz 9 MNEW! Jellypop Women's Glider Distressed Slip On Shoes Brown 177N zWomen's DR Scholl's 2 color suede shoes size 7M,SESTO MEUCCI Slides Size 8 Multicolor Floral Butterflies Made In Italy Shoes,Clarks Women's 8.5 Loafer Bendables Blue Leather Alligator 35590 (ay),Gentleman/Lady Sbicca Womens Shonda Not so expensive special function British temperament,New! Women's Skechers Relaxed Fit: Savor - Dutch 49028 Clogs - Black I31,Sperry Top Sider Womens Size 10 M Leather Boat Casual Shoe Blue / White / Yellow,Women's Sperry Top Sider Angelfish Multi-color Deck Boat Shoes Size 8M Leather,Womens Cute Faux Fur Flats Pointed Wedge Heel Sandals Flip Flops Slipper Shoes,Fossil Metallic Gold Leather Jewel Flower Floral Ballet Flats Shoes Size 8 M EUC** Aerosoles Betunia Slippers - Women's Size 8W Black,Ladies Camellia Block Heels Loafers Summer Sweet Pointy toe Low Top SHoes Casual,SANITA Madeline Women's Brown Leather Slip On Wedge Heel Shoes Size 42,Womens Loafers Driving Moccasins Cow Leather Oxfords Flats Round Toe Plus Sz Nw,Steve Madden Goals Black Womens Shoes Size 10 M Flats MSRP $79,Bearpaw Tegan Scuffs Cozy Slip In Winter Shoes Black New with Box Size 5,Eastland Womens gia Leather Almond Toe Ballet Flats Navy Size 7.5 KBuD,New Womens Fashion Rivets Cnavas Sneaker Breathable Casual Crepper Slip On Shoes,MSRP $59 CALL IT SPRING Size 7 Black Canvas Buckle Loafers Moccasins 390055,Womens Slip On British Oxfords Casual Bowknot Platform High Block Heels Shoes sz,Women Casual Cotton Flax Outdoor Comfortable Round Toe Flat Loafer Shoes,women's Korean sweet diamond bow point w6 toe patent leather flat fashion shoes,Salvatore Ferragamo Brown Suede Shoes Women Size 6 B MoccasinsWomens Tassel Bowknot Wedge Heel Slip on Creepers Faux Suede Outdoor Shoes New,Women's Casual Faux Suede Ankle Straps Pointed Toe Low Heels Lady Work Shoes Sz,

by Sep. 21, 2018, 8:37 AM

To conduct their study, the researchers varied the gender composition of a hypothetical bipartisan legislative committee and the decision it made about a policy impacting women’s rights.

The legislative committee was either all male or gender-balanced, and the choice on the docket was either to increase or decrease penalties for workplace sexual harassment. Since the victims of workplace harassment are overwhelmingly female, a decision to increase penalties signified a positive impact for women, while the decision to decrease the penalties would signify a negative impact.

The presence of women legitimizes legislative decisions

For each of the four possible conditions, the survey respondents were asked whether the decision was right for all citizens, whether it was right for women specifically and how fair it was to women.

They found that the public was substantially more likely to perceive a decision negatively impacting women as fair when it was made by a gender balanced committee than when the same decision was made by an all-male committee. The gender composition had no effect on what people thought about the fairness of the decision when it positively impacted women.

While the presence of women in the committee was more likely to increase the perceived legitimacy of the antifeminist decision for everyone, the effect was twice as strong for men.